
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s recent appearance in the Broadway musical *&Juliet* has sparked a wave of criticism from conservative commentators.
Many of them argue that Supreme Court justices should distance themselves from popular culture to maintain their judicial integrity.
Some observers draw parallels to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s reluctance to retire, suggesting her fame as the “Notorious RBG” may have swayed her decision.
Conversely, it’s important to consider that justices could benefit from being more connected to the public rather than presenting themselves as an aloof elite making impactful decisions on constitutional rights.
A Response to Criticism
A notable voice in this backlash is Carrie Severino from the Concord Fund, an organization previously known as the Judicial Crisis Network.
Her critique raises important questions about the gap between Broadway’s vibrant culture and the conservative factions that oppose progressive social movements.
This controversy invites a deeper examination of whether conservative justices genuinely eschew celebrity.
For instance, Justice Sam Alito has publicly sought recognition, while Justice Neil Gorsuch has shown interest in garnering attention on social media.
Interestingly, some conservatives seem eager to share in the limelight typically enjoyed by their more liberal colleagues, a behavior that contradicts their criticisms of justices like Jackson.
Context and Implications
Severino’s remarks appear to mask frustration with a veneer of neutrality, suggesting that some conservative justices harbor a desire for public acclaim.
Justice Jackson’s Broadway debut contrasts sharply with the narrative surrounding conservative justices, who often claim to face personal safety threats because of their firm constitutional stances.
The backlash also underscored the phrase “queer Broadway musicals,” which highlights a significant bias some factions have against LGBTQ+ representation in the arts.
This echoes a broader discomfort among conservative figures regarding shifting cultural standards.
Judges and Public Life
Moreover, claims about the personal safety of conservative justices warrant further examination.
Reports indicate that justices such as Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito regularly attend public events, often sponsored by outside organizations, challenging the notion that they occupy a secluded existence.
Notably, Clarence Thomas has been implicated in transactions involving loans for mobile homes from interested parties, reflecting his openness to participate in public life under certain conditions.
The conversation surrounding conservative justices frequently conveys a sense of victimhood, often framed by references to an ongoing judicial “crisis” marked by public disapproval.
For instance, the protests during Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings often take center stage, while the significant allegations against him remain conveniently overlooked.
This selective approach to narratives emphasizes the challenges judicial figures face as they navigate their public images within a deeply polarized political context.
Source: Above the Law